Serviceless scheduled tasks

jamie commented

2019-04-09 23:44:07 +00:00

(Migrated from git.hazaar.io)

Currently there is two ways to schedule tasks. One is to schedule from the application by calling a delayed execution function. The other is using a service. The problem is, using a service leaves a process running the whole time and delayed execution uses a closure. I need a way of scheduling a task to run and starting a new process without using delayed execution.

Schedule a task using a static class method including namespace support
Schedule a task from the main warlock configuration file

Currently there is two ways to schedule tasks. One is to schedule from the application by calling a delayed execution function. The other is using a service. The problem is, using a service leaves a process running the whole time and delayed execution uses a closure. I need a way of scheduling a task to run and starting a new process without using delayed execution. * [x] Schedule a task using a static class method including namespace support * [x] Schedule a task from the main warlock configuration file

jamie commented

2019-04-09 23:44:23 +00:00

(Migrated from git.hazaar.io)

assigned to @jamie

jamie commented

2019-04-10 11:08:42 +00:00

(Migrated from git.hazaar.io)

added 1m 6s of time spent

jamie commented

2019-04-11 05:34:47 +00:00

(Migrated from git.hazaar.io)

So the thought here is firstly, instead of having to supply a closure to commands like schedule and delay on a Warlock control object, we can somehow pass a class method or function that is executed within the application context.

So the thought here is firstly, instead of having to supply a closure to commands like `schedule` and `delay` on a Warlock control object, we can somehow pass a class method or function that is executed within the application context.

jamie commented

2019-04-11 05:50:26 +00:00

(Migrated from git.hazaar.io)

marked this issue as related to #45